|
Columnists
Sustainability
and Sustainable Development

Larry
Olson, PhD Professor ASU
Polytechnic
Larry
Olson, PhD., Professor, Arizona State University Environmental
Technology Management Program. Dr. Olson holds a Ph.D. in Chemistry from
the University of Pennsylvania, and is an environmental chemist with
interests in remediation technologies and international environmental
management. He can be reached at 480-727-1499 or by email at Larry.Olson@asu.edu.
A
Sustainable Source of Chemicals?
June
/ July 2009
When
crude oil prices reached $140 per barrel and gasoline prices broke the $4
per gallon barrier a year ago, there was tremendous interest in finding
alternatives to petroleum based fuels and a focus on strategies to wean
ourselves from "foreign oil." Biofuels facilities began to
spring up all over the country, but as oil fell back below $40 per barrel,
many ethanol and biodiesel plants closed. This yo yo cycle has plagued
efforts to produce a viable biofuels industry.
However, there is more to this
story than just fuels. Petroleum refineries have evolved over the last
century to produce not only a high volume, low value product like gasoline
or diesel fuels, but also the starting materials for thousands of other
higher value, lower volume chemical products. Although maybe only 7-8% of
crude oil is used for chemical products, they represent the backbone of
our modern society. Over many decades we have developed technologies to
convert highly reduced carbon compounds into many forms of polymers and
plastics, solvents with specialized properties, pharmaceuticals, etc. The
return on investment for the petrochemical industry is greatly enhanced by
this added value.
By contrast, a biorefinery
utilizes highly oxygenated carbohydrate and lignin materials. Research and
technologies for converting these chemicals into other products lags far
behind traditional petroleum based chemistry and this technology gap needs
to be reversed. Currently less than 10% of the raw materials for the
chemical industry are derived from biomass.
It is estimated that 1.3 x 109
tons per year of sustainable biomass can be produced without upsetting
food supplies or otherwise changing agricultural practices (http://nabc.cals.cornell.edu/pubs/nabc_20/NABC20_Part_3_2c-Bozell.pdf).
That compares to about 1.2 x 107
tons per year of oil produced worldwide (http://www.eia.doe.gov/ipm/supply.html).
Lignocellulosic biomass, the
non-starch, fibrous component of plant material, is primarily cellulose
(30-50%), hemicellulose (20-40%), lignin (15-25%), and other compounds
including ash, resins, and minerals (5-35%). Cellulose (a polymer only of
glucose) and hemicellulose (a more easily hydrolyzed polymer composed of
five different sugars) can be fermented to ethanol. Lignin is the major
non-carbohydrate structural component of wood. It is a highly aromatic
phenolic polymer, with a molecular weight of about 10,000, derived from
coniferyl alcohol.
There are many candidates for
potential bioderived products. Hydrolysis of hemicelluolosic materials
gives primarily sugars such as xylose and arabinose which can be fermented
to give a four carbon compound, 2,3-butanediol, which can then be
dehydrated to give MEK, methyl ethyl ketone. Genomatica, a San Diego based
company, announced in February 2009 that it would license technology to
produce MEK using genetically modified microbes ingesting sugar. At $0.65
per pound, that is the equivalent of $4.50 per gallon which gives a better
margin than just producing ethanol. Xylose is also a starting material for
biochemicals. Glycerol, a byproduct of biodiesel production, is found in
antifreeze, cosmetics, detergents, and pharmaceuticals. Lignin can’t be
used in fermentation, but its highly complex aromatic nature makes it an
attractive candidate for conversion to high value compounds, which is
currently being explored in several universities and private companies.
Successful investments in bioderived fuels and
chemicals must be market driven. But the way we calculate the bottom line
may need to be changed. How will new regulations on climate change affect
these calculations? How much is it worth to our national security to
become independent of unfriendly oil regimes that can hold our economy
hostage? There is a lot of work to be done, but the payoff is worth it.
2008/1234
|