Columnists

Regulatory Developments

Michael C. Ford Attorney

Polsinelli Shughart, PC

 

 

 

Solar Energy Climate Heats Up for Arizona Businesses

April/May 2008

 

Arizona now boasts an impressive array of solar energy incentives for all Arizona businesses (and homeowners for that matter) to take advantage of photovoltaic and solar water heating technology to generate a portion of their own electricity needs, reduce their utility bills, and provide a hedge against rising electricity costs.

The solar industry is undergoing a tremendous worldwide boom primarily as a result of mandates and incentives overseas (Japan, Spain and Germany) but also a number of states (led by California and New Jersey) and the overall increased level of attention and resources being devoted to renewable energy sources due to global warming fears. The average cost per kilowatt hour for solar power remains substantially above that paid by the typical retailer industry customer (12 cents), although the technology is evolving rapidly and some in the industry predict that photovoltaics will start to become competitive with retail electric generation as early at 2010.1 The industry, for the time being, is highly dependent on government and utility incentives.

At the federal level, several key incentives were passed as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. These include a 30% investment tax credit (ITC) for capital projects involving solar energy generation, including photovoltaic (PV) and solar thermal systems.2  The tax credit provision is also applicable to residential projects, although in a more limited manner. (The 30% factor applies but the total credit is limited to $2,000 per year although it applies independently to PV projects and solar thermal projects.)

The ITCs are the first that have been available since 1985. The second major incentive for commercial projects allows solar systems to be depreciated over five years.

Unfortunately, the federal credits were authorized only for limited time periods, initially only available for 2006 and 2007, and subsequently extended for one year (through 2008). The solar industry lobbied hard throughout 2007 to have the federal incentives improved and extended for at least an 8-year period to encourage investment in the industry and ensure long-term stability. The incentives were part of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), but were stripped out at the last minute as part of the negotiation process (the incentives were being linked to the elimination of tax deductions available to the oil industry.)

The other very controversial provision of the EISA proposal that did not make it into the final act was a proposed Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard which would have required electric utilities to provide at least 15% of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020 (or purchase tradable credits). This provision thus would have "federalized" renewable energy targets similar to those currently applicable in Arizona (discussed below).

The tax incentive legislation was raised again in early 2008 as part of H.R. 5351, The Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Act of 2008. Among other incentives, the bill would extend the 30% investment tax credit 8 more years for commercial projects and 6 more years for residential projects, and increase the residential cap to $4,000. It passed the House on February 27, 2008, and as of this writing, the incentive package was expected to be heard before the Senate in March, and the prospects for passage appeared good. A broad-based coalition of business, environmental, and consumer groups, utilities, renewable energy companies and labor organizations were lobbying the Senate to pass the bill. According to their letter,

America is on the cusp of a new, clean energy economy. The clean energy tax incentives in H.R. 5351 would help our county make the transition to this economy – an economy powered by low-carbon technologies that help solve global warming, reduce energy prices for consumers and create new high-wage jobs.

The most critical state-level initiative is the Arizona Corporation Commission’s renewable energy portfolio standard, which requires regulated utilities to generate 15% of their electricity production from renewable sources by 2025, and a substantial portion of this must be from "distributed" sources, e.g., solar panels on your business’ roof top. To encourage increased use of renewable energy, including solar, regulated utilities offer substantial incentives designed to reduce the significant capital investment required for the purchase and installation of equipment, including rebates that, when combined with other available incentives, can cover up to 60% of the system costs. The incentive funding available is limited and allocated between residential and commercial projects.4  These incentives also generally can be applied in addition to the other available incentives. Businesses may also be able to take advantage of special financing arrangements, and "power purchase agreements" to reduce the up-front costs of "going solar."

In the meantime, the Arizona legislature has been active the last two years in enacting measures designed to increase renewable energy use, particularly solar. Arizona has a tax credit provision similar to the federal commercial ITC that applies to solar energy systems, including PVs and solar water heating systems. The tax credit is 10% of the system cost, but is capped at $25,000 and applies only to non-residential systems. The $25,000 cap applies per building, but there is a per taxpayer cap of $50,000 per year.5  The tax credit has currently been extended through 2012.

A number of renewable energy related bills have been introduced in the Arizona legislature in early 2008. Perhaps the most ambitious is the Omnibus Energy Act of 2008 (H2766) which was introduced in mid-February. The bill endorses renewable energy as state policy:

It is the goal of this state to encourage the reduction of carbon emissions by the conservation of energy and the development of renewable and noncarbon emitting energy resources in conjunction with maintaining reliable and low cost electric service to utility customers in this state. This goal is that at least 15 percent of the electricity delivered to retail utility customers in this state shall be from renewable sources of energy.

The target date for achieving this standard is 2025. The Act would also mandate a renewable energy standard for retail electricity providers not subject to the Corporation Commission’s requirements (e.g. Salt River Project which, by the way, has already implemented its own renewable incentives similar to the ACC’s).

As of this writing, several additional bills designed to encourage solar energy production were also pending in the legislature, including H.B. 2614 which would allow renewable energy equipment to be taxed at 20% of its normal depreciated value until 2040; and H.B. 2738 which would establish a state grant program to fund installation of solar technology at schools.

The solar energy climate is changing at a furious pace – almost day-to-day – but the activity all points in one direction: towards increasing investment in and use of solar energy equipment to generate a portion of our energy needs, at the building, local, state, national and global level. It may be the right time for your business to consider the opportunities presented by the solar energy climate here in Arizona.

Footnotes:

 1 ARGUS Analyst Report, First Solar Inc. (created on March 7, 2008).

 2 Because these provisions are part of the tax code, they are of course much more complex, subject to caveats and interpretations. I am not a tax attorney so nothing herein should be construed as tax advice. To evaluate the potential incentives potentially applicable to your project and their impact on your tax liability, a knowledgeable tax attorney should be consulted.

 3 http://www.seia.org/solarnews.php?id=167.

 4 For more information, visit www.aps.com.

 5 H.B. 2429 (2006), H.B. 2491 (2007).

 6 H.B. 2766 (2008) A.R.S. Section 30-901.A.

 

 

 

2008/1234Hit Counter

 
 

Copyright © 2009 by the Journal of Environmental Management Arizona. All rights reserved.

Revised: 05 May 2010 13:10:31 -0400