Columnists

Sustainability and Sustainable Development

 

Nicholas R. Hild, PhD

Professor

ASU Polytechnic

 

Nicholas R. Hild, PhD., Professor, Environmental Technology Management, Arizona State University College of Technology and Innovation, has extensive experience in Environmental Management in the southwestern U.S. Dr. Hild can be reached at 480-727-1309 and by email at DrNick@asu.edu.

 

Targeting Solar Incentives For Existing Arizona Businesses

Feb/Mar 2009

In October of 2009, the U.S. House approved a bill that would create a Solar Technology Roadmap, which lays out R&D needs for the next 15 years. It would authorize $350 million initially and another $550 Million bump in 2015, presumably to be paid to contractors who will determine how the nation will develop a solar industry to diversify our power sources with clean sources of electricity.

Interestingly, if you look at the ‘roadmap’ these politicians propose, it doesn’t say anything about Solar Hot Water Systems which, studies are showing, accounts for 12% to 18% of the total energy consumed by households across the nation. Conservatively, then, let’s say that 15% of residential energy is used to heat water—that’s a significant amount of btu’s, fossil fuel, and carbon emissions that could be totally eliminated by the simple use of SOLAR Hot Water systems—and it’s payback to homeowners —(spell that, T-A-X-P-A-Y-E-R-S)—in real dollars actually going back into homeowner’s pockets; it is not monies paid out to manufacturers in the form of incentives or stimulus monies that never gets paid back to taxpayers.

It seems, however, Arizona politicians, Chambers’ of Commerce, and other business organizations are looking for love in all the wrong places. In their haste to attract ‘green’ industry to Arizona, they have entirely overlooked opportunities right here in our own sun-baked, back yard to jump-start the movement to make solar hot water systems (SHW) available to every home owner and apartment complex in the state—a more efficient use of incentive dollars with a much quicker pay back than giving tax write-downs to out-of-state solar (PV and thermal) industries— that won’t pay back for many years to come.

Thus, there is a way to utilize all that solar radiation without mortgaging the future with tax incentives: it is called SHW. And, there is already a base for the SOLAR HOT WATER industry here just waiting to be incentivized! Look no further than the existing HVAC, and plumbing and piping, and swimming pool companies that are anxious to ‘tweak’ their manufacturing capabilities to build and install solar hot water systems.

For a much smaller incentive package than is being touted for PV Solar makers, a dozen or more companies in a half dozen of Arizona’s largest cities (metro-Phoenix, Tucson, Yuma, Flagstaff) that are already in the HVAC and/or plumbing and/or pool business, could be provided with ‘incentive’ seed monies to purchase all the copper piping, structural materials, and sheet metal required to build SHW systems, and the funding to hire and train permanent skilled craftsmen to build, install, and maintain SHW systems.

If funding those Arizona businesses resulted in a couple of dozen jobs added to each of those manufacturing companies in half a dozen cities, it would result in sustainable economic growth that keeps spinning off other jobs from the copper and sheet metal sectors while homeowners reap their energy savings and their tax credits for installing solar hot water systems on their residences.

Some of those ‘incentive’ dollars could also fund SHW systems grants for non-profit businesses to do the research to find the most efficient ways to manufacture, assemble, and install SHW systems. In addition, those dollars could provide for training to those businesses that need their workers trained, by utilizing the non-profit companies to train the skilled SHW systems craftsmen while allowing the manufacturing companies to reap the benefits of the latest research to make those SHW systems more efficient.

Solar Hot Water systems may not be as sexy as Solar PV but we really should take advantage of all the ways we can utilize our Arizona sun—and that certainly includes the many environmental benefits those include—so why are we not looking at SHW where saving 15% of the energy used in households would have a direct impact on fossil fuels burned, the state’s power industry’s carbon footprint and, homeowner’s too? And all those small businesses would love to be provided with some of those incentives our politicians want to give away— they will gladly retrain their craftsmen and even hire more (yes, that means more jobs), if they can just be included when politicians want to incentivize ‘green’ manufacturers.

In Arizona, there have been no incentives aimed at our own home-grown businesses who justifiably are asking why. With all the "incentives" that both the Fed and States are likely to throw at the solar industry in 2010, the time is long overdue for our state and city politicians to look at SHW incentives for Arizona businesses that will return real dollars to homeowner-taxpayers, while growing the economy, and providing real environmental benefits for our children’s, children’s, children.

 

 

2008/1234Hit Counter

 

Copyright © 2009 by the Journal of Environmental Management Arizona. All rights reserved.

Revised: 25 Feb 2010 17:38:05 -0500