|
Columnists
Sustainability
and Sustainable Development

Nicholas
R. Hild, PhD Professor ASU
Polytechnic
Nicholas
R. Hild, PhD., Professor, Environmental Technology Management, Arizona
State University College of Technology and Innovation, has extensive
experience in Environmental Management in the southwestern U.S. Dr. Hild
can be reached at 480-727-1309 and by email at DrNick@asu.edu.
Educating
Our Youth: Targeting Their Future
October
/ November 2009
Recently,
the U.S. Census Bureau released preliminary demographic statistics from
the last census in a report called the "American Community
Survey." In doing so, they announced that, instead of
conducting a census report every ten years, the Bureau will endeavor to
conduct their surveys annually in the future because we have become such a
diverse population and we move around so often, the so-called ‘statistics’
they glean are out-of- date as soon as they are published. It’s only
taken 6 years to compile this report so its not clear why they think they
can conduct yearly census updates and publish their findings more quickly,
but that’s not so important for us here. What is important are
some rather illuminating demographic stats that environmental (sustainable
development) planners need to think about.
In particular, the preliminary
report provided estimates (only) for the residential population for
cities greater than 65,000 in population, so it was interesting to note
that Phoenix had the youngest median age among the nation’s 15 largest
cities at 30.9 years of age. That, in spite of the fact that we also have
one of the largest retirement-age segments of the population in the nation—-go
figure—but the statistics still show that 29% of Phoenix’s
1,400,000 residents are younger than age 18; that’s a huge revelation!
It strikes me that we can
utilize this demographic information in our never ending quest to
inculcate sustainability in the minds of the most important target group
in Arizona (or anywhere for that matter), that we want to reach—it’s
our youth who will become the future leaders of our
communities!
Stated another way, if 29% of
Phoenicians are under the age of 18, that’s almost one third of the city’s
population who will soon be employed full-time and looking for permanent
residences—(assuming the job market returns in the near future)—most
of whom, according to the Survey, will likely be seeking apartments or
rental homes. (In that age bracket, home ownership is financially tough
even in the best of job growth times).
But, here’s another statistic
that reinforces the old adage that, to maximize your marketing
opportunities, you must know who your audience is. Almost
one-third of our target audience (i.e. the 29% under 18 years old) for
sustainability education must be approached in ways we’ve not considered
before. The reason: according to the Survey, 51% of Arizona’s
population, (not JUST in Phoenix but ALL Arizona),
under the age of 35 are non-white—Hispanics, Native Americans, Blacks,
Asians, and other minorities—and we will not reach them with traditional
logic like, "…go ye forth in a sustainable lifestyle for the
good of the environment…and your children’s future happiness."
Now, couple that with the fact
that the Survey found that 40% of all Hispanics and one-third of all
minority groups in Arizona, don’t have a high school diploma—and 40%
of all families with children are single parent households—those
29% under 18 who make up those families—and, in the words of ‘60’s
activist Godfrey Cambridge, "we have a lot of work to do, folks…a
lot of work!"
It is obvious that our
(combined) efforts to promote the general idea that environmentally
sustainable life styles should become a priority if our future generations
are going to have a "quality of life" legacy we will not
be ashamed of. The idea that single parents with little formal education,
with English as a second language, working two or more jobs just to make
ends meet, can understand sustainability issues, even if they are
explained in elementary schools, just doesn’t make it a priority in
their daily life when they are struggling to keep food on the table and
their kids in school.
So where does that leave us if
we want to move our youth—this diverse demographic of mixed
cultural millennials and ‘tweeners—and motivate them to buy into
sustainable lifestyles and really walk the walk, we need to
provide them more options for how they can integrate their work-lives into
the daily pursuit of sustenance?
Even in a down-economy, our
most jaded politicians appear to understand that we need to be moving
toward an alternative energy future. And, we need to be providing jobs,
education, and training for technician and technical-level
workers in those alternate energy technologies manufacturing facilities—and,
for the first time since the cyberspace revolution began, we are looking
at a future that will (once again) require hands-on and technically
trained/skilled workers who actually know how to make and read schematics
and CAD drawings, skilled workers who know how to fabricate and build…and
implement high-tech solar and wind powered
superstructures and build giant as well as small residential installations—and
we need to provide the tech schools and trade schools that specialize in
training these technician-level workers—today’s youth who will become
the next generation that carries us into a
sustainable-non-fossil-fuel-based future.
It is that diverse (youth) population
identified in the Survey statistics that we really need to be training and
educating today, for the sustainable future we all want to see tomorrow
for our children’s, children’s, children.
2008/1234
|